Forever Banned

So banning of books hit a raw nerve? I think that’s wonderful. Let me tell you a quick story:

Picture it. 1979. I am thirteen, and all that that implies. I close my eyes now and remember the following scenario like it was yesterday:

In Language Arts class. Friday. Watching an interesting filmstrip about Harriet Tubman. Two of my best friends in seats in front of me, whispering together. They glance back at me with wide eyes, smiling. I knew those smiles. Something good was about to go down. I raised my eyebrows and shrugged my shoulders.

What?

I watched my friend write something down on a piece of paper and then fold it up. She stretched her arms behind her and dropped it on the desk of a boy, who then passed the note to me. Trying to keep from being seen by the teacher, I opened the note labeled “Mary’s Eyes Only” carefully and quietly. I read it.

Sleepover at my house tonight in the basement. I have it!!!!!!!

Oh. My. God. I covered my mouth with my hand, barely able to believe it. My friends looked back at me and nodded.

Any 13-year old girl in my school in 1979 knew what “it” was. The book. The one our parents didn’t want us reading. The book about sex, and birth control, and penises and vaginas. No girl’s parents would buy it or let her read it. But there were a couple of copies floating around, mostly belonging to older, more mature girls. Copies belonging to the older girls who let their little sisters read them. Copies that were treasured, protected and idolized. Copies that moved from girl-to-girl, and no matter how hard parents tried, they could not figure out how all of these girls were reading this book.

The book was Forever by Judy Blume.

(Forever delves into the experience of a teenager losing her virginity, and it was groundbreaking when published in the late 1970’s. Blume wrote it for her teenage daughter, who asked her famous author mom to write a book where sex wasn’t punished. The book focuses on birth control and both the practical and romantic details of teen sexuality. The novel is still frequently banned and was actually shelved in the adult section when first published). 

It was tricky getting your hands on this book in my school in 1979. Our school didn’t even allow us to wear jeans. A girl had to have connections, and those connections had to have connections. And even with all those connections, sometimes girls were still not lucky enough to be in the “privileged” group of girls deemed “cool” enough to be able to handle such a scorchingly and sexually “subversive” book as Forever.

We were lucky.

We had worked hard to get our turn at “The Book.” Furtive whisperings at lockers, notes written and passed almost constantly in lunch and in gym class, phone calls made that had to be disguised from nosy parental ears (before cell phones, we had to conduct private conversations in the middle of our houses in front of our whole family- can you imagine?), and long bike rides taken to older girl’s houses where bribery commenced- we brought them milkshakes, makeup, magazines. We brought them whatever they wanted and whatever we could afford.

Because they had The Book. And we wanted It.

I will never forget that sleepover. Wrapped up in our sleeping bags, snacks and drinks ready and the Bay City Rollers playing on the record player, I watched as my friend slowly and dramatically removed the book from her backpack. The cover has changed since 1979, but I remember vividly the way the cover looked back then- a young girl’s face inside of an opened locket, the thick black font of the word “Forever” blazing aggressively and diagonally across the cover.

This copy was dog-eared and worn, and I remember we stayed up until 3:00 a.m. reading passages to each other. Time was of the essence. When a girl was given the book, she had one evening to read it, because the next day it had to be given back to an older girl who would then pass it to the next girl on the list. If it was a weekend, the older girl would show up in front of your house to retrieve it. If it was a school day, she would find you as you were walking into school. The most important thing was to never, ever, ever let a parent or teacher know what was going down. The exchange was always surreptitious and quick, and involved absolutely no discussion whatsoever.

It was our own Underground Railroad.

On that night we read the whole book out loud. We took turns with passages, sometimes reading them over and over, and then discussing the parts that confused us. We laughed, we cried, we nodded our heads. We finally understood.

So this is what it is like to be a girl!

Afterward, coming face-to-face with grownups, especially parents and teachers, was always awkward. We were in their world now. They seemed like our contemporaries, not our adversaries. We knew what they knew. We understood sex. They no longer held anything over us. Male teachers became interesting to us, no longer reminding us of our fathers. Boys became annoying- whereas the day before their chasing and hitting and farting might have seemed charming, now their antics just seemed dull and immature.

The book had opened doors for us.

We now knew what boys had. We now knew what boys were capable of. We now knew what men and women did together in the dark without clothes on. We would roll our eyes at their pathetic little attempts to charm us, and just wished they would grow up and become men, like the men in the book.

The book was published in 1975, so ten years later, when we were juniors in high school, the book seemed silly and precocious. We laughed when we thought of what we had gone through to read it. But at thirteen, that book was the hottest thing going. We would have done anything to get our hands on it. Anything. Because that book held knowledge and power. That book held answers to questions that burned in our brains while we slept, answers that we couldn’t get anywhere else.

I think that’s a pretty good illustration of how well book banning goes.

Professor Piffle

Dr. Jordan Peterson’s new book Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life is in stores. I’ve been waiting impatiently for the March 2nd release date.

When I walked into Barnes and Noble to purchase it, it was not on the front display. This did not surprise me. Peterson is, after all, considered “alt-light” and subversive. The Obamas figured prominently in the front display, as did books on the environment and fiction by authors Janet Evanovich, James Patterson and Dean Koontz.

Neither was it in the New Non-Fiction section. Not in Sociology, Self-Help, Psychology. With my brow furrowed, I could feel my heart racing with literary injustice. It’s a brand-new release from an incredibly popular and brilliant professor, writer and lecturer, I thought. Where the fuck was it?

I kept walking around, but it simply was not displayed. This is impossible, I thought. I sought out an employee and asked politely if she could help me find Dr. Jordan Peterson’s new book. With just a millisecond of dubious hesitation, she smiled and led me to the display.

We walked. And walked. And walked. All the way to the back caverns of some obscure sociological section I would assume is reserved for books written by and about the criminally insane. It took so long to get to the display that I began wishing I had packed a lunch. Finally, we arrived at a table in the far corner of the store, behind a display of candles, journals, and odd literary sundries.

That is where Dr. Jordan Peterson’s book was displayed. On a narrow wall, obscured by a display of scented pencils. That would be akin to Dr. Peterson himself running the Dumbo ride at Disneyland. I mean, how dare they? I turned to the associate and asked, “What, your store doesn’t have a basement?”

She was not amused. She looked strangely at me the whole morning as I worked in the café, maybe thinking I was going to pull out a firearm and force her to read Green Eggs and Ham.

Listen, I don’t know why Jordan Peterson’s book was in a corner. Maybe it was just coincidence, maybe it will be placed in front at a later time. It’s not the point anyway. Book store owners can put books wherever they want. It doesn’t matter. Because the people who want to read them will find them no matter where they are.

While I may not know how to navigate automatic doors and soap dispensers, I am an intellectual. I read everything by everyone. I don’t choose a book based on the author’s political beliefs, sexual orientation, or stance on global warming. On any given day I could be reading a memoir from Michelle Obama, a sociological study by Malcolm Gladwell, a biography on Joseph Mengele, an autobiography by Matthew McConaughey, a treatise by Gloria Steinem, something by Robert Greene, a book about the black arts, *a chronological history of the nipple, a suspense novel by Gillian Flynn or a work of comedic genius by David Sedaris. I once even plowed through Greta Thunberg’s self-indulgent No One is Too Small to Make a Difference in the time it took me to chug a small caramel macchiato.

I felt it was an important book to read. Isn’t this what staying informed and educated is about?

I follow Dr. Peterson on Instagram, and I enjoy the daily discourse and back-and-forth. But in the past few years, it has been suggested to me that I should not be reading his books. That he is subversive. That his followers are dangerous.

We are? I am? But why? I need these answers.

The first thing I have decided to do is to re-read 12 Rules for Life to see if there is something I missed. Something dangerous, as critics purport. Are there Satanic rituals in there? I also decided to do some more rudimentary research. Yesterday I found an article from The Guardian by Dorian Lynskey. Maybe Dorian can clear this up, I thought.

Yikes.

Here are some ways the article referred to Dr. Peterson:

“The culture war’s Weapon X. Heavyweight intellectual armature. Tough-love stern-dad.  Doughty truth-teller. The most important and influential Canadian thinker since Marshall McLuhan. The most influential public intellectual in the western world, ‘a kind of secular prophet … in an era of lobotomized conformism.’ The Professor of Piffle. The stupid man’s smart person. A dangerous goof. An old-fashioned conservative who mourns the decline of religious faith and the traditional family.”

Is that right, Dorian? Well, then, you can step off. Because he’s MY Professor of Piffle.

According to Lynskey, Peterson’s fan base is so popular and strong that requests for interviews from public figures who have ever crossed swords with him decline those requests. Supposedly they don’t feel like getting death threats from Peterson’s fan base, a fan base described to be so zealous that the only way they can be brought to their senses is by Peterson himself. He must tweet them to “back off.”

Who knew?

But this is not me, and I’m certainly not prepared to launch into discourse about post-Marxism. The crux of this post is simply this: Are we what we read? If you look at the books I listed above, and you decided to judge me based on that reading selection, you could easily infer that I am a liberal, a sociologist, a feminist, a climatologist, a Satanist and a Nazi.

Using that logic, isn’t that right?

I am none of those things. I am simply a reader. A lover of words, and thoughts, and concepts, and of the English language. Does Barnes and Noble honestly think that obscuring a new release by a best-selling author is the right thing to do? Moreover, does B&N really think they can keep it out of readers’ hands?

I used to tell my students to never let themselves be defined by geography. Not by salary, not by zip code, not by ethnicity, gender, workplace, income or speech pattern. Who cares where you live, where you work, how you talk? Work on yourself. Because in America, anyone can be anything. That’s the glory that is America.

You can be anything you want to be, we tell our young people. But when we expose them only to the books we deem influential, we send them a different message:

You can be anything you want to be. But only if you’re reading the right books.

I’m not clear on what is going on with Dr. Seuss, because I’m strategically avoiding the news until I can gather my thoughts about it. But I know I’m distressed. As an English teacher, it pains me that any book would be banned or taken out of publication simply because one day someone in a little room with too much time on his hands decided it contained “subversive thoughts or images.”

Any image or thought can be made subversive by an individual who has decided to make them so.

*There is no such book. I looked it up. But it has great potential.